Legal Opinion

Kleinbart v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided June 13, 1978No. 11541PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEWMAN, Chief Judge:

After a bifurcated jury trial, appellant was convicted of carrying a pistol without a license. Based on written assertions by the United States that he had been previously convicted of a felony, an enhanced sentence of from three to ten years’ confinement was imposed for what was otherwise a misdemeanor. 1 He raises three issues on appeal: (1) denial of his right guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment to a public trial; (2) an alleged abuse of discretion by the trial court’s refusal to impanel a second jury for the insanity phase of the bifurcated trial and thereafter by its…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. In Re OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Estes v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Levine v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. People v. JelkeNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
  5. United States v. KobliCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. People v. WoodwardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Kleinbart v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Kleinbart v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Jackson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Jackson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API