Legal Opinion

State v. . Hill

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 14, 1900PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is a criminal action originally begun in the mayor's court of the city of Wilmington wherein the defendant is charged with doing "scavenger work for pay at the surface closet of W. S. Royster, without having license to do such scavenger work and not being employed by the licensed scavenger of the city" of Wilmington. The closet is thereafter referred to as belonging to Niestle. The following are the admitted facts:

That in January, 1899, the defendant made a contract with William Niestle to do his scavenger work for the term of one year by cleaning the closet at his store once a week and…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Butchers' Benevolent Ass'n v. Crescent City Live-Stock Landing & Slaughter-House Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. Brodnax v. GroomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1870
  3. Mayor of Baltimore v. RadeckeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1878
  4. Hill v. . Board of Aldermen of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1875
  5. Norwood v. Raleigh & Gaston RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Porter v. Suburban Sanitation Service, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  2. Ratchford v. . City of GastoniaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API