State v. . Hill
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
This is a criminal action originally begun in the mayor's court of the city of Wilmington wherein the defendant is charged with doing "scavenger work for pay at the surface closet of W. S. Royster, without having license to do such scavenger work and not being employed by the licensed scavenger of the city" of Wilmington. The closet is thereafter referred to as belonging to Niestle. The following are the admitted facts:
That in January, 1899, the defendant made a contract with William Niestle to do his scavenger work for the term of one year by cleaning the closet at his store once a week and…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Butchers' Benevolent Ass'n v. Crescent City Live-Stock Landing & Slaughter-House Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Brodnax v. GroomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1870
- Mayor of Baltimore v. RadeckeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1878
- Hill v. . Board of Aldermen of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1875
- Norwood v. Raleigh & Gaston RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Porter v. Suburban Sanitation Service, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- Ratchford v. . City of GastoniaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919