Legal Opinion

M+W Zander, U.S. Operations, Inc. v. Scott Co.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 22, 2003No. 16-01-16540; A118145PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, J.

Defendant Scott Company (Scott) ordered equipment from plaintiff M+W Zander, U.S. Operations, Inc. (M+W) for use by Scott in a construction project in Eugene. The parties effected the transaction by a purchase order and a later-issued supplemental purchase order both issued by Scott and accepted by M+W. M+W brought this action alleging that Scott breached the contract formed by the purchase orders. Scott moved for summary judgment under the theoiy that M+Ws action was time barred. The trial court granted Scott’s motion, and M+W appeals. Concluding that there is no genuine issue of material…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Yogman v. ParrottOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Searles v. GonzalezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Clunin v. First Federal Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Watson v. Cargill, Inc., Nutrena DivisionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  5. MacHado-miller v. Mersereau & Shannon, LLPCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Burchett v. MasTec North America, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2004
  2. MID-CENTURY INS. COMPANY v. PerkinsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  3. AS 2014-11 5W LLC v. Caplan Landlord, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  4. Johnson v. J. G. Wentworth Originations, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  5. Burchett v. MasTec North America, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API