Legal Opinion

Williams v. Morgan

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1880PublishedCited by 9 opinions

APPEAL from the County Court of Winnebago■ County. Beplevin. The cause was tried by the court, and judgment rendered for the plaintiff, from which the defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the Court

Cole, O. J.

It was insisted on the argument that this action could not be maintained, because, it was said, the evidence shows that the plaintiff was in the undisturbed possession of the goods as receiptor or bailee of the defendant when the suit was instituted, and consequently had no occasion to resort to this remedy. The proposition is doubtless correct, that replevin is a possessory action, brought to obtain possession of specific chattels, in which the plaintiff claims a general or special property, and the right to the possession thereof, and can only be sustained against one who has…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Grace v. MitchellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Perry v. WilliamsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Main v. BellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Heath v. KeyesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1874
  5. Dudley v. RossWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hossfeldt v. DillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
  2. Reid, Murdoch & Co. v. FerrisMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Woodling v. MitchellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  4. Pranke v. HermanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Wilde v. PaschenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1886

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API