Legal Opinion

State v. Satterfield

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 25, 1969No. 45,190PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

O’Connor, J.:

The defendant, Charles E. Satterfield, has appealed from his conviction of uttering and passing a forged instrument (K. S. A. 21-609) on the ground there was insufficient evidence to sustain the verdict. Specifically, the contention is advanced that there was no substantial evidence from which the jury could infer that the defendant had knowledge the instrument was forged.

The state’s case disclosed that on May 29, 1966, the defendant went to Walls I. G. A. store in Wichita and cashed a U. S. Treasury check made payable to Dorman and Bobby…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  2. State v. ChildsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
  3. State v. PattersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
  4. State v. CrosbySupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  5. State v. MurphySupreme Court of Kansas · 1937

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. CippolaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
  2. State v. KliewerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972
  3. State v. KihlstromCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1999
  4. State v. AtenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
  5. State v. YoungSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API