Impact Energy Resources, LLC v. Salazar
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1ConcurrenceSeymour, Circuit Judge
I fully join the per curiam opinion. Judge Lucero and I agree that the statute of limitations begins to run under the Mineral Leasing Act (“MLA”) with the “final decision of the Secretary,” 30 U.S.C. § 226-2, not when the plaintiffs receive notice required by the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”), 5 U.S.C. § 555(e). See Per Curiam Op. at 1245-46. We also agree that the Energy Companies’ suit was untimely because the Secretary’s “final decision” occurred before February 12. Finally, we agree that the district court did not abuse its discretion by denying equitable tolling to the Energy…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Whitman v. American Trucking Assns., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Franklin v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.