Legal Opinion

Fishburn v. PIERCE COUNTY PLANNING

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 26, 2011No. 40429-0-IIPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

250 P.3d 146 (2011)

Daniel and Lori FISHBURN, Appellants,

v.

PIERCE COUNTY PLANNING AND LAND SERVICES DEPARTMENT and Tacoma-Pierce County Health Department (a.k.a. Tacoma/Pierce County Health Department, a.k.a. Pierce County Health Department), Respondents.

No. 40429-0-II.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.

April 26, 2011.

David M. Von Beck, Katie Jean Stuvick, Levy Von Beck & Associates PS, Seattle, WA, for Appellants.

Ronald Lamar Williams, Pierce Co. Pros. Ofc., Tacoma, WA, Matthew R. Wojcik, Daniel F. Mullin, Mullin Law Group PLLC, Seattle, WA, for Respondents.

VAN DEREN, J.

¶ 1 Daniel and…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. BosleyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Young v. Key Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
  3. ATHERTON CONDO APARTMENT-OWNERS ASS'N BD OF DIRECTORS v. Blume Dev. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Taylor v. Stevens CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Jones v. Allstate InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 2002

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gary Alexander And Diane Alexander, Apps. v. Capital One, N.a., Res.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  2. Hugh And Martha Sisley, App v. City Of Seattle, RespCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  3. Kyla Estes v. Jonathon LavoiCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API