Legal Opinion

State v. Diaz

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 24, 1992No. 1 CA-CR 90-926PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LANKFORD, Judge.

The question presented in this appeal is whether a defendant is entitled to withdraw his plea of guilty when he is sentenced to punishment for a felony offense despite a plea agreement which provides for sentencing as an “undesignated” offense pursuant to Ariz.Rev.Stat. (A.R.S.) § 13-702(H).

I

A complaint was filed charging appellant Raul Francisco Diaz (defendant) with possession of marijuana, a class 6 felony. His criminal record includes prior felony convic*147tions. The defendant and the state entered into a plea agreement in which he agreed to plead guilty to a charge of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. State v. DarlingArizona Supreme Court · 1973
  3. State v. De NistorArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  4. State v. LemieuxCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  5. State v. CutlerArizona Supreme Court · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. DiazArizona Supreme Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API