Legal Opinion

Shore v. Pacific Employers Insurance

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 7, 1960No. 38402PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nichols, Judge.

The General Assembly in an act approved January 31, 1946 (Ga. L. 1949, pp. 102, 106; Code Ann. § 114-803), listed various “agents” for which an employee covered by the Workmen’s Compensation Act would be compensated as having occasioned an “occupational disease” if poisoned by any of such “agents.” A comparison of the “agents” used by the claimant in the performance of his duties, as shown by the record, and the list shown in the above act demands a finding that the claimant did not suffer a compensable “occupational disease” as defined by such act.

While it is well settled that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Crawford W. Long Hospital v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
  2. Williamson v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
  3. Cook v. Georgia Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
  4. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. SimpsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp. v. BatesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  2. Pike v. Maryland Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  3. Russell v. Camden Community HospitalSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976
  4. Scandrett v. Talmadge Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  5. Adcock v. AdcockCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API