Legal Opinion
In re People in the Interest of T.T
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided June 17, 2019No. Supreme Court Case 18SA221PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JUSTICE MÁRQUEZ delivered the Opinion of the Court.
*853 ¶1 Under section 27-65-107(7), C.R.S. (2018), when a person is released from short-term treatment for a mental health condition, the clerk of the district court shall seal the record in the case and omit the name of the person from the court's "index of cases." The key question in this original proceeding is whether "Eclipse," the user interface of the judicial branch's computerized case management system, is an "index of cases" as contemplated by section 27-65-107(7).
¶2 This case comes before us in a rather complicated procedural posture.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Fognani v. YoungSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
- Board of County Commissioners v. County Road Users Ass'nSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
- In re Villas at Highland Park Homeowners Ass'n v. Villas at Highland Park, LLCSupreme Court of Colorado · 2017
- In the Interest of Ray v. PeopleColorado Court of Appeals · 2019
- People in re T.TColorado Court of Appeals · 2017
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re People v. KilgoreSupreme Court of Colorado · 2020
- In Re People v. RowellSupreme Court of Colorado · 2019
- In re People v. DeGreatSupreme Court of Colorado · 2020
- Jacob Woodside Rule Discharged en banc JUSTICE HART delivered the Opinion of the Court, in which CHIEF JUSTICE BOATRIGHT JUSTICE HOOD JUSTICE GABRIEL JUSTICESupreme Court of Colorado · 2023
- v. VannessSupreme Court of Colorado · 2020
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.