Legal Opinion

Earl R. Jackson v. Dunham-Bush, Inc., Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., and Roche and Hull, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided June 10, 1964No. 9236PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

This case involves the validity of patent No. 2,755,371 issued to the appellant,. Earl R. Jackson, on July 17, 1956, upon application filed March 20, 1953, for a. device for defrosting of refrigerators, deep freezers and cooling systems. The-complaint charged infringement of the-patent by Dunham-Bush, Inc., Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., and Roche and'. Hull, Inc., appellees. Injunction, accounting and damages were sought. Upon the-issues of the patent’s validity and defendants’ infringement, the District. Court found against the plaintiff Jackson and dismissed the action.

We affirm on the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Jackson v. Dunham-Bush, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1963

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ritter v. Rohm & Haas CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API