Legal Opinion

Siefkes v. Nichols

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided February 28, 1992No. Civ. A. 90-1316-BPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

BELOT, District Judge.

This matter comes before the court on defendants’ motions to dismiss (Doc. 48, 50, 53) pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). Siefkes’ complaint alleges a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, as well as four state law claims brought to this court under the supplemental jurisdiction doctrine. United Mine Workers v. Gibbs, 383 U.S. 715, 86 S.Ct. 1130, 16 L.Ed.2d 218 (1966) and 28 U.S.C. § 1367, Pub.L. 101-650. Defendants contend the § 1983 claim fails because plaintiff cannot meet the state action requirement, or alternatively, because the action is an improper…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Reuben H. Donnelley Corp. v. BrauerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  2. Dow v. Terramara, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API