Legal Opinion

Fields v. Irvin H. Whitehouse & Sons Co.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 1, 1990No. 8921SC657PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORR, Judge.

The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred in denying defendant’s motion to dismiss under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1A-1, Rule 41(d) (1983). For the reasons set forth below, we affirm the trial court’s order.

Under Rule 41(d),

A plaintiff who dismisses an action or claim under section (a) of this rule shall be taxed with the costs of the action. ... If a plaintiff who once dismissed an action in any court commences an action based upon or including the same claim against the same defendant before the payment of costs of the action previously dismissed.the court, upon motion of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Veazey v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. Veazey v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  3. State v. HartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  4. Ward v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Harry Sargeant, III v. Daniel HallCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020
  2. Walker Frames v. ShivelyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  3. VSD Communications, Inc. v. Lone Wolf Publishing Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  4. Kearns v. SpannCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API