Legal Opinion

Collin County v. Schultz

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 20, 1922No. 2569PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWillson, C. J.

(after stating the facts as above).

Appellant insists, and we agree, that the county school trustees were without power to bind it by the contract they made with appellees. In the absence of a statute authorizing some other agency to do so, the commissioners' court alone has power to bind a county by contract. Presidio County v. Clarke, 38 Tex. Civ. App. 320, 85 S. W. 475; Mfg. Co. v. Coleman County (Tex. Civ. App.) 184 S. W. 1063; Disinfecting Co. v. Freestone County (Tex. Civ. App.) 193 S. W. 440; Sparks v. Kaufman County (Tex. Civ. App.) 194 S. W. 605. At the time the trustees made the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fayette County v. KrauseCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1903
  2. Germo Mfg. Co. v. Coleman CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  3. Sparks v. Kaufman CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  4. American Disinfecting Co. v. Freestone CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  5. Presidio County v. ClarkeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1905

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Farmers' State Bank v. Brazoria CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  2. Scaling v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  3. Fulks v. IsaacsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  4. Rohr v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  5. Scaling v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API