Legal Opinion

Bridgett v. Perpetual Bldg. Ass'n

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided September 27, 1950No. 941PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOOD, Associate Judge.

Appellant Bridgett, hereafter called plaintiff, commenced an action against Carl S. and Josephine Z. Dellinger, hereafter called defendants, on a promissory note for $2,200. With the complaint plaintiff filed an affidavit in support of attachment before judgment alleging that defendants were nonresidents. 1 -An attachment was issued and served upon Perpetual Building Association as garnishee.- Interrogatory No. 1, required to- be answered by the garnishee, reads as follows: “Were you, at the time of the service of the annexed- writ of attachment, or have you been,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. New York, C. & St. L. R. Co. v. VardamanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1950
  2. Manos v. FickenscherDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1948
  3. Shipley v. MajorDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1945
  4. United States ex rel. Ordmann v. CummingsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1936
  5. Laughlin v. BerensCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dameron v. Capitol House Associates Ltd. PartnershipDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Launay v. Launay, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Seaboard Finance Co. v. RuppertDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1953
  4. Launay v. Launay, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API