Bridgett v. Perpetual Bldg. Ass'n
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
HOOD, Associate Judge.
Appellant Bridgett, hereafter called plaintiff, commenced an action against Carl S. and Josephine Z. Dellinger, hereafter called defendants, on a promissory note for $2,200. With the complaint plaintiff filed an affidavit in support of attachment before judgment alleging that defendants were nonresidents. 1 -An attachment was issued and served upon Perpetual Building Association as garnishee.- Interrogatory No. 1, required to- be answered by the garnishee, reads as follows: “Were you, at the time of the service of the annexed- writ of attachment, or have you been,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- New York, C. & St. L. R. Co. v. VardamanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1950
- Manos v. FickenscherDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1948
- Shipley v. MajorDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1945
- United States ex rel. Ordmann v. CummingsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1936
- Laughlin v. BerensCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Dameron v. Capitol House Associates Ltd. PartnershipDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
- Launay v. Launay, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Seaboard Finance Co. v. RuppertDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1953
- Launay v. Launay, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985