Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Connor

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided September 5, 1980PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAbrams, J.

The basic issue presented by the report of a Superior Court judge is whether a judge may disqualify counsel for the defendant over the defendant’s objection. Myles J. Connor, Jr., was charged in two indictments with being an accessory before the fact to murder in the first degree. G. L. c. 274, § 2. Martin K. Leppo entered his appearance for the defendant on both indictments. Approximately six weeks later Mr. Leppo filed a “motion for disclosure to determine conflict of interest” accompanied by an affidavit of Connor. After a series of hearings the judge ruled that Mr. Leppo was disqualified…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Holloway v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. United States v. GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  5. United States v. Harry BernsteinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Rodriguez v. District Court for the City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  2. Commonwealth v. TuittMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  3. Commonwealth v. PerryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  4. Commonwealth v. GoldmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  5. Commonwealth v. MartinezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API