Legal Opinion

Cactus Petroleum Corp. v. Chesapeake Operating, Inc.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 9, 2009No. 102,588PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtReif, J.

{1 The issues presented on certiorari review are whether the trial court erred (1) in certifying a class of working interest owners, and (2) in approving the proposed settlement agreement over the objections of two working interest owners. The objectors challenged the class certification, alleging that the class was not a cohesive group because the objectors did not sign a marketing election letter agreeing to the marketing fees. According to the objectors, the class representative could not adequately represent their interests because the class representative had signed an election letter…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Devlin v. ScardellettiSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Lynn and Deyon Boughton v. Cotter CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  5. Margaret L. Johnston v. Hbo Film Management, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Weber v. Mobil Oil Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2010
  2. MARSHALL COUNTY v. HOMESALES, INC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
  3. Anifer v. Clement Trucking LLCDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2024
  4. HITCH ENTERPRISES v. KEY PRODUCTION COMPANYCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2022
  5. MARSHALL COUNTY v. HOMESALES, INC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API