Legal Opinion

Weber v. Mobil Oil Corp.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 13, 2010No. 106,241PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WATT, J.:

T1 We granted certiorari to address a single issue: whether the claims of fraud, deceit, constructive fraud, and punitive damages are appropriate for class certification? The facts reveal that: the majority of the royalty owners appear to be Oklahoma citizens; Mobil made representations as to the appropriate payments in Oklahoma; the representations were made and acted upon primarily in Oklahoma but also in other states; Mobil made the representations in Oklahoma to the royalty owners and to the Oklahoma Corporation Commission (Corporation Commission) in its successful attempt to…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Lynn and Deyon Boughton v. Cotter CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  2. Harvell v. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
  3. Welty v. Martinaire of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  4. Shores v. First City Bank Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  5. Grant Thornton LLP v. Suntrust Bank, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2004

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Speed v. JMA Energy Co., LLCCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
  2. Foster v. Apache Corp.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2012
  3. Peppertree Farms, L.L.C. v. ThonenOhio Supreme Court · 2022
  4. Chieftain Royalty Co. v. QEP Energy Co.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2012
  5. Whisenant v. Strat Land Exploration Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2018

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API