Weber v. Mobil Oil Corp.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
WATT, J.:
T1 We granted certiorari to address a single issue: whether the claims of fraud, deceit, constructive fraud, and punitive damages are appropriate for class certification? The facts reveal that: the majority of the royalty owners appear to be Oklahoma citizens; Mobil made representations as to the appropriate payments in Oklahoma; the representations were made and acted upon primarily in Oklahoma but also in other states; Mobil made the representations in Oklahoma to the royalty owners and to the Oklahoma Corporation Commission (Corporation Commission) in its successful attempt to…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Lynn and Deyon Boughton v. Cotter CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Harvell v. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
- Welty v. Martinaire of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- Shores v. First City Bank Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Grant Thornton LLP v. Suntrust Bank, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2004
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Speed v. JMA Energy Co., LLCCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- Foster v. Apache Corp.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2012
- Peppertree Farms, L.L.C. v. ThonenOhio Supreme Court · 2022
- Chieftain Royalty Co. v. QEP Energy Co.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2012
- Whisenant v. Strat Land Exploration Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2018
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.