Legal Opinion

Seich v. Town of Canton

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 6, 1997PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLynch, J.

The plaintiffs appeal from the grant of summary judgment in the Superior Court in favor of the defendant town. We transferred the case here on our own motion and now affirm.

The plaintiffs allege that Amy Seich was injured as a result of a slip and fall on an unnatural accumulation of ice on the town’s property while attending her daughter’s basketball game. Her husband’s claim is for loss of consortium.

The town relies on the Commonwealth’s recreational use *85statute, G. L. c. 21, § 17C, as an affirmative defense.2 *4The plaintiffs contend that G. L. c. 21, § 17C, does not apply because they paid…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Anderson v. City of SpringfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  2. Leary v. Contributory Retirement Appeal BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
  3. Catanzarite v. City of SpringfieldMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1992
  4. Molinaro v. Town of NorthbridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
  5. Diane Dimella v. Gray Lines of Boston, Inc., and Herb Edmunds, United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Marcus v. City of NewtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012
  2. Whooley v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2003
  3. Maltz v. Smith Barney, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  4. Cohen v. Elephant Rock Beach Club, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2014
  5. Dunn v. City of BostonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2009

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API