State v. Janes
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Thayer, J.
The defendant, Richard Janes, Jr., appeals his conviction for driving while intoxicated (DWI), subsequent offense. RSA 265:82, I (Supp. 1995), :82-b, I(b)(1) (1993). He argues that the Portsmouth District Court (Sullivan, J.) erred in failing to exclude a prior DWI conviction in Massachusetts from being used for sentence enhancement purposes on the ground that the conviction involved a plea that failed to comply with the constitutional requirements of Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 (1969). We affirm.
The defendant was charged with DWI, subsequent offense, in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Custis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- State v. WeeksSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
- Richard v. MacAskillSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. HahnWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
- Camp v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
- Millette v. Warden, New Hampshire State PrisonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
- State v. BilbenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. BilbenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014