Legal Opinion

State v. Janes

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided October 24, 1996No. 94-201PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Thayer, J.

The defendant, Richard Janes, Jr., appeals his conviction for driving while intoxicated (DWI), subsequent offense. RSA 265:82, I (Supp. 1995), :82-b, I(b)(1) (1993). He argues that the Portsmouth District Court (Sullivan, J.) erred in failing to exclude a prior DWI conviction in Massachusetts from being used for sentence enhancement purposes on the ground that the conviction involved a plea that failed to comply with the constitutional requirements of Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 (1969). We affirm.

The defendant was charged with DWI, subsequent offense, in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Custis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. State v. WeeksSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
  4. Richard v. MacAskillSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. HahnWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Camp v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  3. Millette v. Warden, New Hampshire State PrisonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
  4. State v. BilbenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  5. State v. BilbenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API