Legal Opinion
United States v. Arnold
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 10, 2008No. 06-50581PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The opinion filed April 21, 2008, is amended as follows:
1. At 523 F.3d 941, 946 n. 1 (9th Cir. 2008), in the first sentence replace “incoming” with “outgoing.”
With the foregoing amendment, the panel has unanimously voted to deny the petition for rehearing. Judge O’Scann-lain and Judge M. Smith, Jr., vote to deny the petition for rehearing en banc and Judge Mosman so recommends. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc and no active judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R.App. P. 35.
The petition for rehearing and the petition…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Almeida-Sanchez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- California v. AcevedoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- United States v. Howard CottermanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Theodore StewartCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Maria Molina-IsidoroCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. SaboonchiDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2014
- Abidor v. NapolitanoDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.