Pennsylvania State Ass'n of Jury Commissioners v. Commonwealth
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Dissent
DISSENTING OPINION BY
President Judge PELLEGRINI.
Because I can’t see how the abolishment of jury commissioners and the sales of personal property and surplus farm products are in any way germane to each other, I would find that Act 108 of 2011 is unconstitutional under Article III, Section 3 of the Pennsylvania Constitution because it contains more than one subject.
I
Article III, Section 3 of the Pennsylvania Constitution, relating to the form of bills, provides that “[n]o bill shall be passed containing more than one subject, which shall be clearly expressed in its title-” Article Ill’s aim…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- City of Philadelphia v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Pennsylvanians Against Gambling Expansion Fund, Inc. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Payne v. School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
- Pennsylvania ex rel. George v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Pennsylvania State Ass'n of Jury Commissioners v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012