Legal Opinion · Dissent

Pennsylvania State Ass'n of Jury Commissioners v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 26, 2012Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION BY

President Judge PELLEGRINI.

Because I can’t see how the abolishment of jury commissioners and the sales of personal property and surplus farm products are in any way germane to each other, I would find that Act 108 of 2011 is unconstitutional under Article III, Section 3 of the Pennsylvania Constitution because it contains more than one subject.

I

Article III, Section 3 of the Pennsylvania Constitution, relating to the form of bills, provides that “[n]o bill shall be passed containing more than one subject, which shall be clearly expressed in its title-” Article Ill’s aim…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Philadelphia v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Pennsylvanians Against Gambling Expansion Fund, Inc. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Payne v. School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  4. Pennsylvania ex rel. George v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. Pennsylvania State Ass'n of Jury Commissioners v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API