Legal Opinion

Midland Management Co. v. Helgason

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 8, 1993No. 2-92-0331PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bowman

Plaintiff, Midland Management Company, appeals from an order in a forcible entry and detainer action which determined that defendant, Ronald Helgason, was prejudiced and his due process violated by plaintiff’s trial testimony. Plaintiff also appeals the ruling that plaintiff waived its right to forfeiture of the lease by its acceptance of housing assistance payments by HUD. We affirm.

On November 14, 1986, plaintiff as lessor and defendant as lessee entered into a written lease for a residential unit at Harbor Village Apartments in Aurora. Defendant’s tenancy was subsidized by the United…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Vialez v. New York City Housing AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
  2. Freeman v. Chicago Transit AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Casson v. NashIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Waukegan Times Theatre Corp. v. ConradAppellate Court of Illinois · 1945
  5. American Family Mutual Insurance v. BaaskeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Midland Management Co. v. HelgasonIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Northern Illinois Home Builders Ass'n v. County of Du PageAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  3. Kiemle & Hagood Company v. Mariam P. Daniels a/k/a Phoebe DanielsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2023
  4. Midland Management Co. v. HelgasonIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Savett v. DavisAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API