Schrempp v. Munro
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBrachtenbach, J.
Appellants challenge the decision of the Secretary of State to accept and file Initiative 120, the merits of which are not at issue.
Appellants sued in superior court for injunctive and declaratory relief and a writ of mandamus. The trial court assumed, without deciding, that appellants were proper parties to challenge the acceptance and filing of the initiative. The trial court denied any relief. After oral argument this court issued an order affirming the trial court. We now state our reasons for affirming.
The issues are:
1. Do appellants have statutory authority to challenge the decision of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- State v. GunwallWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Kreidler v. EikenberryWashington Supreme Court · 1989
- State ex rel. Case v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Alaska Coast Co. v. Alaska Barge Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
- In Re the Estate of LittleWashington Supreme Court · 1986
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- King County v. Washington State Boundary Review BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- Washington Federation of State Employees v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- City of Sequim v. MalkasianWashington Supreme Court · 2006
- 1000 Friends of Washington v. McFarlandWashington Supreme Court · 2006
- Washington Fed. of State Emp. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1995
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.