Legal Opinion

Jones v. Crumpler

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided June 8, 1916PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to a judgment of the Court of Law and Chancery of the city of Norfolk, in an attachment proceeding in which other creditors intervened. Judgment for intervenors. Plaintiff assigns error.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

This attachment proceeding was instituted by W. M. Jones to garnishee in the hands of Eure & Co. certain funds belonging to his debtor, E. L. Crumpler,

Curtis Pope, Samuel Bunn, John Hunt, Richard Hunt, William Catten and the Citizens Bank of Windsor intervened in these proceedings, claiming that the fund attached belonged to them severally in various amounts. Upon the hearing the lower court sustained the claim of the intervenors and directed the garnishees to pay the fund, $798.79, attached in their hands, to the several internevors, as follows: To Curtis Pope $235.00; to Samuel Bunn…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gellert v. Bank of California, National Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Guaranty Trust Co. v. Seaboard Air Line Ry. Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1935
  3. City Nat. Bank of Clinton, Iowa v. West Virginia Farm Bureau Service Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1930
  4. McMillan v. Citizens & Southern National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API