Legal Opinion

People v. Gerke

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1868PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from the District Court, Second Judicial District, Tehama County. This was an action to recover delinquent taxes. The Court below found as a fact that the property upon which the delinquent tax was assessed was a growing crop, and found, as a conclusion of law, that such property was exempt from taxation. Judgment passed for the defendant, and the People appealed.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, Sanderson, J. :

In the case of The People v. McCreery, 34 Cal. 433, we held the ¡Revenue Laws of this State to be unconstitutional, so far as they exempt private property from taxation. It follows that, in reading those laws, all parts thereof relating to the exemption of private property must be disregarded.

The property in question in this case was private property, and was therefore taxable.

Judgment reversed, and the Court below directed to enter judgment for the plaintiff.

Mr. Justice ¡Rhodes expressed no opinion.

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Florer v. SheridanIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Cottle v. SpitzerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  3. People v. EddyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Jackson & Perkins Co. v. Stanislaus County Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  5. People v. The Black Diamond Coal Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1869

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API