Michael Branden Whetsell v. Kevin Alexander Murnock & PFC Martinez
District Court, D. South Carolina
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA Michael Branden Whetsell, ) C/A No. 2:24-cv-05487-BHH-MHC ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ) Kevin Alexander Murnock & PFC Martinez, ) ) Defendants. ) ) Plaintiff Michael Branden Whetsell (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, filed this action alleging violations of his constitutional rights. ECF No. 1. Before the Court is a Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendants Kevin Alexander Murnock and PFC Martinez. ECF No. 50. Because Plaintiff is proceeding pro se, the Court issued an order pursuant to Roseboro v. Garrison,
528 F.2d 309
(4t…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.