Legal Opinion
Horton v. New York Central Railroad
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 6, 1922PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Kiley, J. :
This is what is known as a negligence action. (See Code Civ. Proc. § 1902 et seq.; now Deceden,Estate Law, § 130 et seq., as *429added by Laws of 1920, chap. 919.) The appellant owns and operates a branch of its system from Troy to Schenectady and was so operating it on the 29th day of May, 1921. It runs in an easterly and westerly direction, it is crossed at grade, at Dunsbach Ferry station, by a highway running in a northerly and southerly direction from Cohoes to Dunsbach Ferry. Dunsbach Ferry is a summer resort. On May 29,1921, the plaintiff’s intestate was killed at this station…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Henavie v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1901
- Hintze v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
- Matutinovich v. New York Central RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
- Phelps v. Erie RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
3Cited by3 opinions
- Crough v. New York Central RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
- Horton v. New York Central RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
- Grimshaw v. Rutland RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923