Legal Opinion
Voigt v. City of Medford
Massachusetts Superior Court
Decided January 30, 2007No. 200500163FPublished
1Opinion of the Court
MacLeod-Mancuso, Bonnie H., J.
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Cheryl Voigt’s (Voigt) motion for partial summary judgment, pursuant to Mass.R.Civ.P. 56, against Defendant Ciiy of Medford (City). For the reasons stated below, Voigt’s motion for partial summary judgment is ALLOWED.
BACKGROUND
On September 3, 2004, Voigt filed an application for a special permit with the Medford Ciiy Council pursuant to the Medford Revised Ordinances (ordinance), §94-81.3 The purpose of the ordinance and the special permit process is “(t]o promote the health, safety, morals, convenience and general…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Board of the County Commissioners of Bryan County v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Kourouvacilis v. General Motors Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- Members of the City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for VincentSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.