Legal Opinion

Gay v. Stewart

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 22, 1940No. 7 Div. 558Published

1Opinion

On Rehearing.

THOMAS, Justice.

The motion to dismiss the appeal in the case was not a part of the record proper. It required a consideration of the evidence which, on the trial, was extended at great length. This could only be shown by a bill of exceptions.

In Dorrough v. Mackenson, 231 Ala. 431, 165 So. 575, 577, this court said:

“* * * an rulings on pleadings and other matters which are a part of the record proper need not so appear, nor need there be a bill of exceptions to review the ruling on them. * * *
“The motion to vacate the order of April 29, 1935, because of what it shows on its face…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dorrough v. MacKensonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  2. Parker v. WhiteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  3. Universal Motor Lines, Inc. v. WalkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API