Legal Opinion

Dorrough v. MacKenson

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 23, 1936No. 6 Div. 810PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

In this cause appellant began a suit by attachment, which was abated on plea. See 229 Ala. 336, 157 So. 257. He then made a motion to retax the costs on account of the number of defendant’s witnesses under sections 7239, 7240, and 7247, Code. The court made an order on that motion on April 29, 1935, in the following language: “Motion to retax court cost having been filed more than thirty days after judgment in the case this court ■ overrules the motion.” This order was not extended in the form of a judgment.

Appellant then filed a petition in this court praying for a writ of…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Stover v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  2. Powell v. FolmarSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
  3. Bell v. OttsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  4. Thomas v. CarterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  5. Drennen Motor Co. v. PatrickSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Littleton v. Gold Kist, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1985
  2. Harris v. BarberSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  3. Delbridge v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  4. Barker v. ByarsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  5. W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. ConeAlabama Court of Appeals · 1940

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API