Commonwealth v. Jackson
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
FLAHERTY, Justice.
This appeal presents the issue of whether a prior conviction more than ten years old may be used for impeachment purposes if the witness has been recommitted for a parole violation within ten years. We hold that Commonwealth v. Randall, 515 Pa. 410, 528 A.2d 1326 (1987), permits a conviction for an offense involving dishonesty or false statement to be used to impeach the credibility of a witness if he has been confined for that conviction within ten years even if the incarceration is due to recommitment for a parole violation.
Appellant, Lawrence Jackson,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BighumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- United States v. Janice Wallace, United States of America v. Elmore PennCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Harold S. McCLINTOCK, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Rivenbark v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Commonwealth v. RootsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Commonwealth v. RiveraSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Commonwealth v. HarrisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Commonwealth v. BoylesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- State v. Al-AminCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.