Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Jackson

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 29, 1991No. 32 E.D. Appeal Docket 1990PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

FLAHERTY, Justice.

This appeal presents the issue of whether a prior conviction more than ten years old may be used for impeachment purposes if the witness has been recommitted for a parole violation within ten years. We hold that Commonwealth v. Randall, 515 Pa. 410, 528 A.2d 1326 (1987), permits a conviction for an offense involving dishonesty or false statement to be used to impeach the credibility of a witness if he has been confined for that conviction within ten years even if the incarceration is due to recommitment for a parole violation.

Appellant, Lawrence Jackson,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BighumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. United States v. Janice Wallace, United States of America v. Elmore PennCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  3. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Harold S. McCLINTOCK, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  4. Rivenbark v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Commonwealth v. RootsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Commonwealth v. RiveraSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. Commonwealth v. HarrisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. Commonwealth v. BoylesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. State v. Al-AminCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API