Legal Opinion

Robert Kenneth Schoultz v. Carl Hocker, Warden, Etc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 24, 1972No. 72-2390PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Schoultz is a Nevada state prisoner. After exhausting his state remedies, he filed a petiton for habeas corpus in the District Court. 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The court denied the petition without conducting an evidentiary hearing. We have concluded that this was error. In his appeal, Schoultz presents three contentions, but we now reach only one. This contention is based upon one of Schoultz’ allegations in his petition, that he was induced to plead guilty in the state court because the prosecuting attorney made the promise that if Schoultz did so plead, he would be sentenced to a period of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. L. D. Hilliard v. Dr. George J. BetoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  3. Howard R. MacOn v. Walter E. Craven, Warden, Folsom State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sturrock v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Gamble v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Fine v. Warden, Nevada State PrisonNevada Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Kyle David Gardner v. Bertram Griggs, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
  5. Whitman v. WardenNevada Supreme Court · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API