Legal Opinion
Housley v. Cerise
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided March 31, 1992No. 89-CA-2140PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES C. GULOTTA, Judge Pro Tem.
This case has been remanded to this court by the Louisiana Supreme Court for consideration of the issue of quantum only.1 Defendants appealed the trial court judgment claiming that the damages awarded in this case are excessive. Plaintiffs neither appealed the trial court judgment nor answered the defendants’ appeal. We vacate in part and affirm in part.
The trial court awarded damages to the minor child, Vickie Ann Housley, in the amount of $400,000.00. This amount included $250,000.00 for past and future pain and suffering, mental anguish and physical and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Reck v. StevensSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1979
- Housley v. CeriseSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1991
- Folse v. FakouriSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1979
- Hobgood v. AucoinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1990
- Housley v. CeriseLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Vidrine v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2011
- Turner v. Cleveland Trust Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1996
- Pontiff v. Pecot & Associates Rehabilitation & Physical Therapy Services, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2001
- Hollis v. McDermott, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1995
- Housley v. CeriseSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1992