Legal Opinion

City of Philadelphia v. Emhart Corporation

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 18, 1970No. Civ. A. 70-352, 70-494PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION II AND ORDER

WOOD, District Judge.

This is a motion by the four named defendants to transfer both captioned cases to the District of Connecticut pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). The defendants are manufacturers of so-called Master Key Systems which are lock and key systems designed specifically for a particular complex of buildings, and include keys which open only a single lock in the system, and master keys, which will open all or a group of locks within the system. The plaintiffs in both suits seek treble damages for alleged horizontal and vertical conspiracies by and among the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City of Philadelphia v. Emhart Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1970
  2. Bayly Manufacturing Co. v. Koracorp Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1969

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Proctor & Schwartz, Inc. v. Cleveland Lumber Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Aamco Automatic Transmissions, Inc. v. BosemerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Residex Corporation v. FarrowDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Follansbee M. Co., Inc. v. John T. Clark & Son of NH, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. Weinberger v. Retail Credit CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API