Legal Opinion

State v. DiLiberto

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 25, 1976No. 36454PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RENDLEN, Judge.

John DiLiberto appeals his conviction of “misconduct in office,” a misdemeanor under § 558.110, RSMo 1969, V.A.M.S.,1 alleging as error: (1) insufficiency of the information; (2) the State’s failure to make a submissible case; (3) erroneous admission of hearsay testimony; and (4) failure to define the terms “willfully” and “maliciously” appearing in the main verdict director. Unfortunately, the prosecutor’s office has not favored this court with a brief and the only assistance comes from that supplied by appellant.

In late March of 1972, Steven McClay, involved in an automobile…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  2. State v. HaslerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. State v. CantrellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
  4. State v. McCloudMissouri Court of Appeals · 1958
  5. State v. MuchnickMissouri Court of Appeals · 1960

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. GardnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
  2. State v. AtterberryMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Paxton v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. State v. LadnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. State v. MayhueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API