Legal Opinion

State v. Ladner

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 17, 1981No. 41609PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SATZ, Judge.

Defendant was found guilty by a jury of “felonious embezzlement” under former § 558.260 RSM01969, 1 and he was fined $1.00. He appeals. We reverse.

Defendant raises 9 points on appeal. We discuss only the determinative issue, which requires a reversal. Defendant was originally charged by indictment and then was charged by an information in lieu of indictment. He contends the information was fatally defective because it failed to inform him of the offense with which he was charged. We agree.

As one of its basic requirements, an information must inform the defendant of the “nature and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. KestersonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
  2. State v. DownsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  3. State v. BrooksSupreme Court of Missouri · 1974
  4. State v. HaslerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1969
  5. State v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Government of the Virgin Islands v. Arthur PembertonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
  2. State v. O'CONNELLSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
  3. State v. AtterberryMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. State v. DaleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
  5. State v. EmoryMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API