Legal Opinion

Hordern v. Salvation Army

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 6, 1908PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal by the defendant,. The Salvation Army, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 5th day of July, 1907, upon the verdict of a jury for $3,000, and also from an order entered in said clerk’s office on the 3d day of August, 1907, denying the defendant’s motion for a new trial made upon the minutes.

1Opinion of the Court

Ingraham, J.:

The defendant is the owner of a building known as Eos. 120, 122 and Í21 West Fourteenth street, in -the city of Hew York. There is a room in the cellar which contains boilers for use in the building. The defendant is a corporation organized under the laws of this State as a religious and charitable corporation and devotes this building entirely to its charitable work. The plaintiff was' employed by one Daniel Oarey as a foreman steamfitter. He was sent by his employer to work in the engine room and boiler room of defendant’s building; the boiler room was connected with the engine…

2Cited by19 opinions

  1. Rinehart & Dennis Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Virginia · 1923
  2. Lytton v. Marion Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  3. Di Tommaso v. Syracuse UniversityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
  4. New Ætna Portland Cement Co. v. HattCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1916
  5. Lanham v. BondSupreme Court of Virginia · 1931

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API