Legal Opinion

Day v. Day

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided July 15, 1844PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor.

The complainant filed her .bill for a divorce a vinculo matrimonii, upon the ground of adultery by the defendant, her husband. , ..

The marriage is admitted by the answer, but the adultery denied.

There is no direct evidence of the fact of adultery, and the question, is, whether the circumstances detailed in the evidence sustain, the, charge.

If direct evidence of the fact should he required in such cases, it must generally render relief impracticable. But there must be such proximate circumstances proved, as will satisfy the le *445gal conviction of the court, that the crime has been…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Egnozzi v. EgnozziNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
  2. Del Presto v. Del PrestoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1966
  3. Johnson v. JohnsonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API