Legal Opinion
Del Presto v. Del Presto
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided September 22, 1966PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
92 N.J. Super. 305 (1966)
223 A.2d 217
ROSE DEL PRESTO, PLAINTIFF,
v.
ANTHONY DEL PRESTO, DEFENDANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.
September 22, 1966.
Mr. Herman E. Dultz, attorney for plaintiff.
Mr. Harold M. Savage, attorney for defendant.
CONSODINE, J.C.C. (temporarily assigned).
Defendant seeks to bar the admissibility of evidence secured by illegal forcible entry into the corespondent's home by plaintiff and private investigators. The motion raises the broad question of whether Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643, 81 S.Ct. 1684, 6 L.Ed. 1081 (1961), as decided or extended by subsequent…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Wolf v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Burdeau v. McDowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State of Iowa v. Union Asphalt & Roadoils, Inc.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 1968
- Stapleton v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- United States v. John A. McGuire Edmond G. Blumner and Herbert PerryCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- Wright v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1966
- Del Presto v. Del PrestoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.