Legal Opinion
Funk v. Cable
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 10, 1966No. Civ. 9012PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SHERIDAN, Chief Judge.
This is a motion by defendants to dismiss the action because the complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, or in the alternative, to require plaintiff to file a more definite statement.
This action is brought pursuant to Section 1 of the Civil Rights Act of 1871, 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983. Plaintiff alleges that defendants, members of the board of directors of the School District of the Township of Montgomery, Franklin County, Pennsylvania, the tax collector of the District, a justice of the peace and a constable of Antrim Township, Franklin County, in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Basista v. WeirCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965
- Donald A. Swan v. Board of Higher Education of the City of New York by Gustave G. Rosenberg, Its Chairman, George A. Pierson, and Margaret v. KielyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- Robert William Crawford v. Lt. Woodrow W. Zeitler and the Toledo, Ohio, Police Dept.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964
- Beauregard v. WingardDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1964
- Anderson v. HaasCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Robert F. Jennings v. Arthur Shuman, Jr., Robert J. Conway, Gustave Naring, and John DoeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Nienstedt v. WetzelCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
- Aileen Henig, a Minor Together With Ludwig Henig and Geneva M. Henig, Her Parents v. Rocco A. OdoriosoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
- Ammlung v. City of ChesterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
- U. S. Ex Rel. Brzozowski v. RandallDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1968
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.