Legal Opinion
Royal Leisure v. TLAM, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 5, 2013PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to confirm an arbitration award, TLAM, Inc., and Lauretta Frazer appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Whelan, J.), dated October 13, 2011, as, upon reargument, denied their motion to vacate their default in appearing at an arbitration.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
To vacate their default in appearing at an arbitration, TLAM, Inc., and Lauretta Frazer (hereinafter together the TLAM defendants) were required to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Abrams v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Hye-Young Chon v. Country-Wide InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Government Employees Insurance v. Dae-Hee LeeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
3Cited by4 opinions
- Matter of Weinstock v. LiebermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Allstate Insurance v. GrodzkiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Allstate Insurance v. GrodzkiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Matter of Progressive Direct Ins. Co. v. SpicerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018