Legal Opinion

Strackbein v. SAIF Corp.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 28, 2000No. WCB 96-03694, 96-08239; CA A99635, A100449Published

1Opinion of the CourtWollhejm, J.

In these consolidated petitions for review, claimant challenges two separate orders of the Workers’ Compensation Board. The first order reversed administrative law judge (ALJ) Herman’s order awarding claimant permanent total disability (PTD). According to the Board, claimant was not entitled to any additional permanent disability. The second Board order reinstated SAIF’s denial of a post-concussive syndrome (PCS). We review both orders for substantial evidence. ORS 656.298(7); ORS 183.482(8)(c). Hurlburt v. Tecton Laminates Corp., 135 Or App 202, 203, 897 P2d 347 (1995); Armstrong v.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  2. Hurlburt v. Tecton Laminates Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API