Legal Opinion

Elk Horn Coal Corp. v. Casebolt

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 6, 1930No. 5243PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORMAN, Circuit Judge.

This case turns upon the construction of a mineral deed of July 23,1903, from William Casebolt and his wife to the appellant’s grantor. The granting clause purports to convey all coal, iron, oils, gasses, minerals, and mineral substances in a certain tract of land. Following this there is the phrase: “It is understood that there is an oil and gas lease on this tract of land, and grantor is to have the benefit of said lease.” The lease which is referred to was executed by Casebolt on September 7, 1901, and was for a term of twenty years and as much longer as gas and oils…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gillispie v. BlantonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
  2. Lester v. Mid-South Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1924
  3. Stanley v. SloneCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
  4. Ohio & Michigan Coal Co. v. Clarkson Coal & Dock Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1920
  5. Elkhorn Coal Corporation v. SloneCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Government Personnel Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. WearCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
  2. Elk Horn Coal Corp. v. HackworthCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1932
  3. Atlantic Refining Co. v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1950
  4. Atlantic Refining Co. v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1950
  5. Elkhorn Coal Corp. v. HackworthCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API