Legal Opinion

Blake v. United American Insurance

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided December 30, 1998No. C-2-97-791PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION & ORDER

MARBLEY, District Judge.

This cause comes before this Court on Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff Steven Blake brought this case, claiming he was demoted and fired as an insurance agent at Defendant United American Insurance Company (“United”) in retaliation for his repeated whistleblow-ing activities. Defendants United, Globe Life and Accident Insurance Company, and Torchmark Corporation (collectively “Defendants”) claim both actions were motivated by Blake’s professional inadequacies, not retaliation. For the following reasons, Defendants’ Motion for Summary…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Clarence Erwin Copeland v. Mark MacHulis James StephensCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Whitman v. City of BurtonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. Bruce Whitman v. City of BurtonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. Bruce Whitman v. City of BurtonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API