Legal Opinion

Colorado Nat. Bank v. Western Grain Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 8, 1928No. 6 Div. 91PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARDNER, I.

The appellant insists it was a bona fide purchaser for value of the two drafts, the proceeds of which are here involved, and this is the sole question pre? sented on this appeal.

‘‘A bank does not become a bona fide purchaser for value and without notice of a negotiable paper by simply discounting it for one not its debtor at the time and placing the amount to the credit of the holder by way of deposit. In such circumstance the act of discounting and of crediting only effects to establish 'the relation of debtor and creditor betw-een the depositor and the bank; but, if the amount…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sherrill v. Merchants & Mechanics T. & S. BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  2. Elmore County Bank v. AvantSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  3. Tatum v. Commercial Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  4. National Bank of Commerce v. MorganSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  5. Alexander v. Birmingham Trust & Savings Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lowrance Motor Co. v. First National Bank of AuburnCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
  2. Loop Nat. Bank of Mobile v. CoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  3. Herron Motor v. First Nat. Bank of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  4. Patterson v. First National Bank of HuntsvilleCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1971
  5. Andrews v. First Nat. Bank of TampaSupreme Court of Florida · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API