Legal Opinion
Colonial Gas Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided March 5, 1992No. Civ. A. No. 89-1106-WDPublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON MOTIONS TO COMPEL PRODUCTION AND TO STRIKE REPORT
BOWLER, United States Magistrate Judge.
Pending before this court are defendant Aetna Casualty & Surety Company’s motion to compel (Docket Entry #56) and motion to strike (Docket Entry # 72). Plaintiff Colonial Gas Company (“plaintiff”) objects to production on the grounds of attorney-client privilege and work product doctrine. (Docket Entry #60). The procedural history and factual background are summarized below.1
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Defendant Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. (“defendant”) originally filed its motion to compel with an…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- In Re Sealed CaseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
- In Re MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
- Admiral Insurance Company v. United States District CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- In re the Reorganization of Electric Mutual Liability InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
- Commissioner of Revenue v. Comcast Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
- State Ex Rel. United Hospital Center, Inc. v. BedellWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1997
- In re Grand Jury SubpoenaDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2004
- In Re: San Juan v. MassaroCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.