Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Hill

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 7, 2007No. COA06-1218Published

1DissentTyson, Judge

I concur in that portion of the majority’s opinion deeming defendant to have abandoned his assignment of error regarding 05 CRS 51915 and that there is no error in the verdicts or the consolidated judgments entered thereon. The majority’s opinion also holds the correction to the indictments allowed by the trial court “was a substantial alteration of the original charge” in violation of N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-923(e) and vacates the judgments and sentences of five counts of First Degree Sexual Offense entered upon five indictments and jury verdicts. I find no prejudicial error in the trial…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. WallaceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  2. State v. JerrettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  3. State v. SnyderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
  4. State v. PriceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  5. State v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API