Legal Opinion

Chicago Great Western Railway Company, Plff. In Err. v. State of Minnesota

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 21, 1910No. 377PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court 1

216 U.S. 234

30 S.Ct. 353

54 L.Ed. 460

CHICAGO GREAT WESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY, Plff. in Err.,

v.

STATE OF MINNESOTA.

No. 377.

Argued and submitted November 8, 1909.

Decided February 21, 1910.

This suit, like that of the Great Northern R. Co. v. Minnesota, just decided [216 U. S. 206, 54 L. ed. ——, 30 Sup. Ct. Rep. 344] involves the constitutionality, as applied to the plaintiff in error, of chapter 253, General Laws of Minnesota of 1903, requiring every railroad company owning or operating any line of railway in that state to pay an annual tax, commencing with 1905, equal to 4 per cent of the gross…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Harlan.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  2. Great Northern Railway Co. v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  3. State v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  4. Chicago Great Western Railway Co. v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1910

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Samuel C. Johnson 1988 Trust v. Bayfield CountyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API