Legal Opinion

Weber v. Lynch

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 28, 1975No. Appeals, Nos. 156 and 159PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Jacobs, J.,

This consolidated appeal questions the propriety of Rule 303J, a local rule of the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas. The rule, which relates to appeals from compulsory arbitration,1 provides that

“ [e] xcept by allowance of the court for good cause shown, no witness, other than an after discovered witness, may be called by a party at any subsequent trial who was not called as a witness by that party at the arbitration hearing.”2

The appellees, plaintiffs below, were not satisfied with an arbitration award in their favor and appealed to the common pleas court. At the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Smith CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  2. Virnelson Motor Vehicle Operator License CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  3. Meta v. Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  4. BELL v. ShetromSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  5. Commonwealth v. Philadelphia Eagles, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. In the Interest of C.S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Weber v. LynchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Albright v. the Wella Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. In Re Damon B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Campbell v. Eitak, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API